<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rejects of the World Unite&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/2008/07/16/rejects-of-the-world-unite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/2008/07/16/rejects-of-the-world-unite/</link>
	<description>Where Baking and Humor Meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah LaClaire</title>
		<link>http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/2008/07/16/rejects-of-the-world-unite/comment-page-2/#comment-76020</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah LaClaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/?p=398#comment-76020</guid>
		<description>Mmmm, those all look so good!! I don&#039;t understand why they wouldn&#039;t accept those photos, especially if they&#039;re like the ones in your foodie blog. They must be extremely picky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmm, those all look so good!! I don&#8217;t understand why they wouldn&#8217;t accept those photos, especially if they&#8217;re like the ones in your foodie blog. They must be extremely picky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Culinary Concoctions by Peabody &#8211; What&#8217;s a happening hot stuff???&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/2008/07/16/rejects-of-the-world-unite/comment-page-2/#comment-66408</link>
		<dc:creator>Culinary Concoctions by Peabody &#8211; What&#8217;s a happening hot stuff???&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/?p=398#comment-66408</guid>
		<description>[...] that reads “You don&#8217;t need pasties to be tasty!” So true. So true. Tastespotting: I am showing up on Tastespotting, and I hope you are too. Some of you let me know I didn&#8217;t need validation for my photos. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that reads “You don&#8217;t need pasties to be tasty!” So true. So true. Tastespotting: I am showing up on Tastespotting, and I hope you are too. Some of you let me know I didn&#8217;t need validation for my photos. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peanut Butter Toffee Topped Blondies &#38; Giveaway Winner :) &#171; Nutmeg Nanny</title>
		<link>http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/2008/07/16/rejects-of-the-world-unite/comment-page-2/#comment-64066</link>
		<dc:creator>Peanut Butter Toffee Topped Blondies &#38; Giveaway Winner :) &#171; Nutmeg Nanny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/?p=398#comment-64066</guid>
		<description>[...] 36. It&#8217;s a blow to the self esteem let me tell you. I once read a post by a fellow blogger, Peabody, who had the same issue but in reverse. Tastespotting seemed to be the one doing the denying. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 36. It&#8217;s a blow to the self esteem let me tell you. I once read a post by a fellow blogger, Peabody, who had the same issue but in reverse. Tastespotting seemed to be the one doing the denying. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Namba</title>
		<link>http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/2008/07/16/rejects-of-the-world-unite/comment-page-2/#comment-63757</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Namba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.culinaryconcoctionsbypeabody.com/?p=398#comment-63757</guid>
		<description>Wow!! YOUR photos were rejected on Tastespotting?  I know you wrote this post in 2008 but I just now came across it.  I have actually been bummed out recently because they are rejected my entries more often than accepting them. Most of my photos were rejected because of &quot;composition&quot;.  I was so upset that I googled &quot;Tastespotting rejections&quot; to see what it would come up with - I wanted to make myself feel better.  I&#039;m very familar with your blog and love all of your postings so when I saw that YOU actually had an issue with Tastespotting....well, I felt better.  I feel better.  I&#039;m still not gonna give up.Thanks for giving me a new perspective on it. I go through their pages and I see photographs that I think are not good at all. What in the hell are they looking for?!!! I just don&#039;t &quot;get it&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!! YOUR photos were rejected on Tastespotting?  I know you wrote this post in 2008 but I just now came across it.  I have actually been bummed out recently because they are rejected my entries more often than accepting them. Most of my photos were rejected because of &#8220;composition&#8221;.  I was so upset that I googled &#8220;Tastespotting rejections&#8221; to see what it would come up with &#8211; I wanted to make myself feel better.  I&#8217;m very familar with your blog and love all of your postings so when I saw that YOU actually had an issue with Tastespotting&#8230;.well, I felt better.  I feel better.  I&#8217;m still not gonna give up.Thanks for giving me a new perspective on it. I go through their pages and I see photographs that I think are not good at all. What in the hell are they looking for?!!! I just don&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

